Home > Nigeria, Pakistan, Shoshana Bryen, terror > Attempted bombing was not a single criminal event but rather an act of war

Attempted bombing was not a single criminal event but rather an act of war

December 29, 2009 Leave a comment Go to comments

By Shoshana Bryen

WASHINGTON, D.C. –It was bad enough that United States agents failed to take seriously the visit by Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab’s father, a prominent banker, to the U.S. Embassy in Nigeria to report his concerns about his own son’s associates and behavior. It was bad enough that spokesmen for the U.S. government later said the father’s concerns, “didn’t rise above the level of noise.” It was bad enough that after the attempt to blow an airliner out of the sky with more than 200 people aboard was thwarted only by the brave instinct of a passenger, Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano said that all the security systems worked (a statement she was forced by public ridicule to recant). And it certainly was bad enough that the U.S. government moved first to its default position that Abdulmutallab was a lone actor, not a card-carrying member of a terrorist group. 
And it was unfortunate that when President Obama finally made a public statement three days later, the best he could do was note that, “This was a serious reminder of the dangers that we face” and “It’s absolutely critical that we learn from this incident.”
 
The danger we face is jihadist ideology which glorifies the killing of Americans and other Westerners, and what we should learn is that the “war against terrorists and the states that harbor and support them” was not a figment of the previous administration’s imagination.  
 
Because of the insistence of the Obama Administration that the dangers we face are simply individual criminal events, Abdulmutallab has been charged with a federal criminal complaint comprised of two civilian crimes-trying to destroy a plane in U.S. airspace, and bringing a “destructive device” on an aircraft. They are felonies, carrying penalties of up to 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000. No mention of terrorism. According to some legal experts, these charges are “place keepers” to allow the government to detain Abdulmutallab while the investigation continues.
 
The implications, however, are immediate and grave.
 
Counterterrorism expert Steven Emerson, interviewed right after Christmas said, “I’d like to first find out who recruited him. I’d like to find out where he got the explosives. I want to get the signature of the bomb, which is now being determined by forensic investigators at Quantico. I’d like to find out who sent him. How he was recruited. Those are all things they may find out, obviously, through the interrogation of him, plus a review of his cell phone records, his travel records, his computers, or laptop if they can retrieve it. Interviews with his colleagues, his friends, or whatever. And now a review of his national security records over the past year to see whether he actually came into the United States ahead of time, as they think he did, to do a reconnaissance mission to determine the feasibility of carrying out such an attack.”
 
We would want to know those things as well. But being charged in a U.S. court means that Abdulmutallab is now entitled to Constitutional protections, including the Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination. And we are sure that if Abulmutallab doesn’t know about those rights, his court appointed lawyer or the ACLU will surely tell him. How much we will learn from him under the circumstances is unclear.
 
We have already learned enough about the young men-from the United States, from Nigeria, from Pakistan-who adopt jihadist teachings as their religious touchstone to understand that it is a mistake to endow terrorists with the legal and constitutional rights of American citizens who violate civilian laws. 
 
The United States and the West are at war and it is that of danger the President should consider himself to have been reminded-mercifully, without anyone being killed.
 
 *

Bryen is senior director of security policy of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs.  Her column is sponsored by Waxie Sanitary Supply in memory of Morris Wax, longtime JINSA supporter and national board member.

  1. neel123
    January 5, 2010 at 6:55 pm

    @ carol ann goldstein

    India has been the target of Pakistan sponsored terrorism since 1989, but no one listened, no one cared until the 9/11 happened.

    Such attacks on India can not be traced to Americans policies, Bush or Cheney.

    You have to understand that what is happening in Pakistan, under the watchful eyes of their military and the ISI, has a different dimension, which has been deliberately mixed up with grivances of the Arab world to mislead the international community

    Using Islamist terror as an instrument of Foreign policy must be condemned, and crushed with iron fist, failing which the entire world will be consumed in its fire !

  2. carol ann goldstein
    January 3, 2010 at 4:23 pm

    It was President Bush and his cabinet who decided to reduce the effort in Afghanistan and start a war in Iraq. One must examine US foreign policy since WWII in the Middle East, and European colonialism in Asia, Africa and the Middle East as the roots of the current terrorism around the world.

    We must not forget that September 11, 2001 happenend on President Bush’s watch. We must not forget that President Bush and VP Cheney refused to testify under oath and publicly before the commission that investigated the 9/11/2001 attacks; Bush and Cheney testified secretly and not under oath as they demanded. We must not forget that there was no investigation of who was responsible for the 9/11/2001 attacks; everyone on the planes was killed and it was assumed that the 11 Middle Eastern Muslim men on the passenger manifests were guilty of the attacks – it was not that long ago that the appearance of Jewish names on a passenger manifest would have been deemed them guilty of whatever crime happened.

  3. neel123
    December 29, 2009 at 1:50 pm

    Absolutely !

    It is time the world realizes that these terror attacks in India and elsewhere by the muslim jihadis are not stray incidents, and that we are in the midst of a war.

    These terrorists would be provided safe heavens in the mosques, and in the populated areas by their sympathizers amongst the civilians.

    As a result, a large number of innocents would pay with their lives in this war.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a comment