Leichtag Family Foundation donates $20,000 to North County’s Food Bank
SAN MARCOS, California (Press Release)- North County’s Food Bank received a donation from the Leichtag Family Foundation in the amount of $20,000.00 that will enable North County’s Food Bank to continue providing food to those individuals and families in North County that need it most.
Sharyn Goodson of the Leichtag Family Foundation presented the check to Stan Miller, Executive Director of North County Community Services which oversees North County’s Food Bank.
North County Community Services (NCCS) is committed to improving individual health and well being by providing programs that educate young children, support working families, feed the hungry and ultimately create opportunities to improve the quality of life for residents in north San Diego County. For 40 years, NCCS has been providing vitally needed services to North County residents in San Diego County, operating nine child development centers as well as North County’s Food Bank which was established in 1989.
North County’s Food Bank services income-qualified individuals and families within the Cities of Oceanside, Carlsbad, Encinitas, Solana Beach, Vista, San Marcos, Poway, Escondido, Del Mar and the community of Rancho Bernardo – this translates into an area of approximately 1,815 square miles and is equivalent to 1/3 of the total square miles of the entire San Diego County.
Attending the ceremony were Paul Hammans (Food Bank Operations Manager), Michael Lawson (Director of Food Bank Operations), Stan Miller (NCCS Executive Director), Sharyn Goodson (Leichtag Family Foundation) and Dennis Chamberland (Development Specialist).
*
Preceding provided by North County Community Services
Commentary: Palestinians, Israelis ever so slowly being pushed by U.S. into direct talks
By Ira Sharkansky
JERUSALEM– Israel and Palestine may be inching, crawling, or sidestepping toward direct, face to face negotiations.
We have heard this before. It is a long and contorted road even to the beginning of talks. Neither side appears to be enthusiastic. They are being pushed by the pathetically naive, led by the champion of brazen optimism who is trying to outdo his predecessor by choosing peace in the Holy Land over democracy in Iraq as an icon of foreign policy. European leaders can do no less than add their voices to that of a president with the status to define what is politically correct. Those in power hope that a miracle will occur quickly enough for them to claim credit.
What is shaping up is a call to negotiations from a quartet that includes representatives of Europe, Russia, the US and the UN with parameters favorable to the Palestinians. It is said to include the 1967 boundaries as the basis of negotiations, and a continuing freeze on Israeli construction over that line. Israel has already rejected those conditions, but may be willing to accept an invitation from the United States that is less unfriendly.
One can guess about the prospects of discussions that neither side wants, and which begin with each claiming to be operating according to different invitations. For Palestinians, the 1967 lines represent their major hope of rescuing something from an area shrinking and cut up with the settlements of Jews they do not want living among them.
Also important to the Palestinians is a continuation of a freeze in the building of settlements. They are also talking about a freeze in what they call Arab neighborhoods of Jerusalem, but one can reach a high level of skepticism about any chance of achieving that detail. A continuation of the freeze over 1967 boundaries outside of Jerusalem will be difficult enough, given the intensity of the opposition in the polity that counts for more than the Palestinian and perhaps more even than that in Washington.
Recent news is that settlers and their friends have approvals for 5,000 housing units ready to be unfrozen in September, and will not tolerate a continuation of a freeze that has failed to show any tangible results with respect to its contribution to peace.
One can only wonder at the importance of 1967 or any other date in a conflict between peoples that was already apparent to the authors of the Books of Joshua and Judges, whenever it was that they began to tell their stories.
“The Israelites lived among the Canaanites, Hittites, Amorites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites. They took their daughters in marriage and gave their own daughters to their sons, and served their gods.” (Judges 3:5)
Today there are considerable personal interactions, cooperation in the workplace and the universities, more mutual tolerance in Jewish than Arab neighborhoods, along with few romances or conversions in the directions of Islam or Judaism.
The boundaries of Jerusalem have changed several times since the British arrived in 1917, and many times before then. The walls around the Old City reflect the lines defined by the Ottoman Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent in the 1530s. They are only one of several walled arrangements meant to protect a city whose shape changed going back at least to the time of David.
Conceptions of “Palestine” are fuzzier. The bombast of activists represent their efforts to find some basis for a national claim in what can fairly be described as a backwater of empires thinly populated by diverse and quarreling families.
No doubt that all national claims–including those of the Jews–rest on contentious narratives more often spiritual than factual in nature. The Bible, Talmud, numerous other writings, and the success of modern Israel represent the Jews’ claims to legitimacy. It will take some time to see if the Palestinians can achieve the status of other Arab countries. The records achieved by Gaza and the West Bank indicate that the phrase “Arab democracy” will remain an oxymoron even if the Palestinians do accomplish something.
We should expect maneuvering rather than anticipate anything like a breakthrough. Part of the playbook we can write already. There will be some further hemming and hawing by the principals, with each adhering to its own rules of the game. Palestinians will emphasize those 1967 boundaries and maybe a settlement freeze; Israelis will insist that they are beginning negotiations without preconditions. If things go well, overseas sponsors may invite the principals to a party on the White House lawn, or some other ceremonial venue where they declare a breakthrough and their commitment to helping the parties reach an agreed solution within a short period of time.
The principals will put on their frozen smiles and express mutual commitments to settling disputes peacefully, or maybe their stern faces and commitments to what those loyal to each side will see as a reaffirmation of well known principles.
Given Muslim sensitivities, the refreshments will feature fruit juice rather than wine.
Beyond these details, my predictive capacity weakens. After a brief flurry of daily bulletins, it is likely that the weather will provide more interesting news. Americans will concern themselves with who will win and lose by how much thanks to the president’s health reform, as well as the World Series and the endless parade of college sports. For Europeans there will be a new season of football.
*
Sharkansky is professor emeritus of political science at Hebrew University.
150 Irish artists, intellectuals declare Israel boycott
DUBLIN (WJC)–More than 150 Irish artists and intellectuals have declared a boycott of Israel, saying they would not perform or exhibit there until Israel ceases what they call “abuse of Palestinian human rights.”
The artists also pledged to reject funding from any institution associated with the Israeli government. The Ireland Palestine Solidarity Campaign (IPSC) said the boycott would continue until “Israel complies with international law and universal principles of human rights”.
Eoin Dillon of the Irish world music band Kila said he had signed up to the campaign because “it worked in South Africa.” An Israeli Embassy spokesman in Dublin said the boycott was regrettable and ill-advised. He added: “Vilifying and ostracizing Israel and promoting a lose-lose program of boycotts is not the way to secure legitimate Palestinian rights”.
Among the artists supporting the boycott are the musicians Damien Dempsey and Donnal Lunny, artists Robert Ballagh and Felim Egan, playwright Jimmy Murphy and actress Neilil Conroy.
“Culture cannot stand aloof from politics,” boycott coordinator Raymond Deane said in a statement. “Whether or not art is ‘above politics’, its presentation and representation in the real world can all too easily be hijacked by oppressive states. With this pledge, Irish artists have an opportunity to distance themselves from such exploitation, and to take a non-violent stand on behalf of the oppressed Palestinian people.”
The move comes in a period in which several high profile artists have cancelled concerts in Israel for “political reasons”. Elvis Costello, the Pixiesand the Gorillaz Sound System were among those who boycotted scheduled performances there for political reasons. Earlier this month the band Massive Attack used a spot at a festival to attack Israel and promote the cause of Palestinian refugees.
*
Preceding provided by World Jewish Congress
Australians hold inter-faith discussions on Israel
SYDNEY (WJC)– Jewish and Christian leaders have met to heal the wounds caused by the National Council of Churches’ call last month for a boycott of Israeli goods made in the West Bank. The church council called for Australians to consider the boycott at the request of Middle Eastern churches.
The president of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, Robert Goot, wrote to the council saying the resolution was a “most unpleasant surprise” and added: “We feel that we have been badly let down by people we have long thought of as our friends”.
Last week, Goot met in Sydney with the leaders of the Catholic and Anglican churches, archbishops Philip Wilson of Adelaide and Phillip Aspinall of Brisbane. On Monday, both councils said in a joint statement that a “serious exchange of views” had helped Christian leaders better understand Jewish concerns and Jewish leaders better understand why the resolution was adopted.
The general-secretary of the National Council of Churches, Tara Curlewis, said the statement showed the depth of the relationship between the groups. They would meet again to work on a “more comprehensive” statement. In the meantime, the boycott resolution remained in place.
*
Preceding provided by World Jewish Congress
Iran tells Western nations not to interfere in stoning sentence
TEHERAN (WJC)–Iran has told Western nations to stay out of the case of a woman who faces death by stoning, warning it would not tolerate any interference in the matter as it was still under examination by the judiciary.
“Independent nations do not allow other countries to interfere in their judicial affairs,” Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast said at a press conference. He was responding to questions from reporters about the status of Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani, a 43-year-old mother of two sentenced to death by stoning by an Iranian court.
“Western nations must not pressurize and hype it up… judicial cases have precise procedures, especially when it concerns murder. If a person committed a crime in Iran, that person is prosecuted which is normal, especially if she has killed somebody. The heavier the sentence, the more meticulous we are in carrying it out. This is being done,” said Mehmanparast.
Western nations and human rights groups have come out strongly against Mohammadi-Ashtiani’s stoning sentence and warned that her execution was imminent. The head of Iran’s judiciary, Sadeq Larijani, temporarily suspended the sentence from being carried out.
The human rights organization Amnesty International says Mohammadi-Ashtiani was only sentenced for having an “illicit relationship” with two men and that the murder charge was adopted later.
*
Preceding provided by World Jewish Congress
Women of the Hebrew Bible, Part 4: Miriam
By Sheila Orysiek
SAN DIEGO–Miriam, a prophet in Israel, led the dancing and singing after safely crossing through the parted sea. As a girl she had watched what happened to the basket containing her baby brother, and had the courage to speak to the Princess of Egypt suggesting that she find a nurse (Jochebed) for the infant. She was part of the team, with her brothers, Moses and Aaron, who led the people in their trials and triumphs through the desert of Sinai.
One of a series of seven women of the Hebrew Bible illustrating the moment in their lives when they were at pivotal point, contributed significantly to subsequent events and/or set a precedent in the history of our people.
The original is pen and ink on paper, measuring 16 by 20.
*
Orysiek is an artist and freelance writer based in San Diego